On 26/11/13 17:28, Chris Tucker wrote:
Yes, the patch fixes the OFX imports that were causing a messagebox saying the 
transactions would be ignored.  Now they find the existing security by ticker 
and use it for the imported transactions.

--

Chris

OK, Chris, thanks. I was pretty sure you had but didn't want to beat my head against the wrong wall. Just getting back on the trail.

Allan

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 02:02:39 PM Allan wrote:
I'm still investigating, but have now added your patch, and it makes no
difference here.  statementTransactionUnderImport.m_strSymbol.toLower()
is empty, but a match is still found on the security name.  Strangely,
at the moment, on iterating through the list, it doesn't match with the
existing transaction's name, which is correct, but with its own name
which is already in the list.  I don't yet understand that, but I think
I know why the symbol is empty, but I think it lies within the statement
reader, so CSV inport and OFX import should work the same way.

Very strange, but to be sure, did your patch definitely fix your problem?

Allan

_______________________________________________
KMyMoney-devel mailing list
KMyMoney-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel

Reply via email to