https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321108
--- Comment #6 from David Houlden <djhoul...@gmail.com> --- > I prefer to think of it as a feature, rather than a bug! The change was > made deliberately, rather than by accident. It came about following > discovery of several inconsistencies where the Enter/OK was not enabled when > it should have been, or vice versa. See Bug 314955. > > I did flag the issue there, and canvassed - > " > It would be good to know what fields should be regarded as mandatory for > transaction entry. I don't know if some looseness is allowed, because of > importing, but then it is quite strictly laid out for investments. > Allan, apologies if I missed some earlier discussions about this. I can see you did ask for opinions. However, in my defense, Bug 314955 makes no mention of making payee mandatory. In fact, under expected results it says "The two entry methods should behave similarly, so far as the amount field is concerned." suggesting an inconsistency with the amount field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
