https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308247
--- Comment #6 from allan <agande...@gmail.com> --- @ Thomas I need your guidance here, I'm afraid. What constitutes a valid split? The problem transactions here have a split amount but no 'S' split category, although they do have a 'L' category item. I have eliminated the cause of the crash, in extractSplits(listqSplits), where the absence of the 'S' bypassed the creation of a listqSplits entry. However, if I create a istqSplits entry on the presence of a '$' split amount, there is no split category so the imported transaction is flagged as having no category, which was present, but with an 'L' entry. If the apparently useless '$' is edited out, these transactions import with the 'L' category assigned, so the user has no need of editing the transaction category. So, to me, the best way would be to ignore (or flag) any split amount entry which isn't accompanied by a 'S' split category. Any other ideas, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
