Hello, On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Cristian Oneț <onet.crist...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2011 21:27:25 Alvaro Soliverez wrote: > > In cases where a commit has to be applied to several branches, it can be > > merged to one branch, and cherry-picked from the others. > > Does this mean that the commits in the stable branch must be cherry-picked? > > If they were relevant to stable, yes. But this is much simpler than before, where backporting implied applying a patch, or copy-pasting the code. > Also: > $ git branch -r > origin/4.5 > origin/4.6 > origin/HEAD -> origin/master > origin/master > > Do we really still need origin/4.5? It seems like clutter since we don't > use > it anymore. > > Well, there's history there that may not be in other branches, as some commits might only live in the stable branches. I'd say we keep those branches. Regards, Alvaro
_______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
