https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265728
--- Comment #5 from Cristian Onet <onet cristian gmail com> 2011-05-15 15:39:03 --- I didn't saw the width growth aspect that disturbing (with 20 items using the smallest resolution). Could you attach a screenshot with your findings? Right now the only constraint is set for the legend height which seems right since all legend rows have uniform height. Setting a correct constraint on the legend width would be more difficult since the row length could vary a lot on different datasets. I also don't think that we can't remove the configuration option since there is a limit to the number of rows that can be readably displayed in the legend and if the user has more datasets in the chart then it's nice that he can keep the legend readable on his machine (the limit is dependent on the resolution). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
