From: Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]>

Add weakdep support to the kernel spec

Upstream change 61842868de13aa7fd7391c626e889f4d6f1450bf  when combined
with a modern kmod creates a situation where modules.weakdep is
"installed but not packaged".  We should handle this file like the rest
of the depmod generated files.  Do not package it, but create the ghost
entry for when it gets generated on post.

Signed-off-by: Justin M. Forbes <[email protected]>

diff --git a/redhat/kernel.spec.template b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
index blahblah..blahblah 100644
--- a/redhat/kernel.spec.template
+++ b/redhat/kernel.spec.template
@@ -2793,7 +2793,7 @@ BuildKernel() {
             # in case below list needs to be extended, remember to add a
             # matching ghost entry in the files section as well
             rm -f modules.{alias,alias.bin,builtin.alias.bin,builtin.bin} \
-                  modules.{dep,dep.bin,devname,softdep,symbols,symbols.bin}
+                  
modules.{dep,dep.bin,devname,softdep,symbols,symbols.bin,weakdep}
         popd
     }
 
@@ -3991,6 +3991,7 @@ fi\
 %ghost %attr(0644, root, root) 
/lib/modules/%{KVERREL}%{?3:+%{3}}/modules.softdep\
 %ghost %attr(0644, root, root) 
/lib/modules/%{KVERREL}%{?3:+%{3}}/modules.symbols\
 %ghost %attr(0644, root, root) 
/lib/modules/%{KVERREL}%{?3:+%{3}}/modules.symbols.bin\
+%ghost %attr(0644, root, root) 
/lib/modules/%{KVERREL}%{?3:+%{3}}/modules.weakdep\
 %{expand:%%files -f kernel-%{?3:%{3}-}modules.list %{?3:%{3}-}modules}\
 %{expand:%%files %{?3:%{3}-}devel}\
 %defverify(not mtime)\

--
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/3324

-- 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to