On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:49:24AM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 22:49:53 -0000, GitLab Bridge on behalf of bcrocker wrote:
> > diff --git a/redhat/Makefile b/redhat/Makefile
> > index 555dea25ea0f..e7ba07066177 100644
> > --- a/redhat/Makefile
> > +++ b/redhat/Makefile
> > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ dist-dump-variables:
> >     @$(REDHAT)/dist-dump-variables.sh
> >  
> >  dist-self-test:
> > -   @if dnf list installed bats >& /dev/null; then \
> > +   @if test -x /usr/bin/bats >& /dev/null; then \
> >             bats $(REDHAT)/self-test/*.bats ; \
> >     else \
> >             echo "dist-self-test: The bats package is not installed" ; \
> 
> Please merge this to the patch that is introducing this code instead of
> piling a fixup on top. Similarly for other patching in this set.

Yes, as a tip on your local git tree you can do:

git rebase -i <previous sha1 from patch that introduced the dnf list line>

then you can pick the commit which adds test -x and squash it into the first
commit:

pick <sha1 from patch that introduced the dnf list line>
squash <sha1 from patch that adds test -x>
...

You can update the changelog with v2 and what changed, and then force push to
the MR the new set.

If you already aware of rebase -i ignore me, just trying to help.

-- 
[]'s
Herton
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to