On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Josh Boyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Justin Forbes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Jeff Backus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> (Apologies - resending because I wasn't subscribed earlier)
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I'm contacting you on behalf of the x86 SIG. Today FESCo approved our
>>> request to continue to support Fedora on x86 hardware, provided that we do
>>> our part to keep things running.
>>>
>>> I encourage you to reach out to us when things do come up. You can find us
>>> at [email protected] or on #fedora-x86. We will likewise try to
>>> be proactive in tracking down and triaging x86-related issues as well as
>>> helping test and debug things.
>>>
>>> One caveat that FESCo attached to our request is that if you, the kernel
>>> team are cleared to treat i686 as any other secondary arch when you run
>>> into build issues. That is, you are allowed to ExcludeArch i686 until these
>>> issues are resolved. We ask that you block FE-ExcludeArch-x86 so that we
>>> can track these issues.
>>>
>>> Happy to do so.  There wasn't much need on the current issue because there
>> are other problems keeping us from getting a successful build just yet.
>> Yay, merge window. I really appreciate the SIG stepping forward and finding
>> the solution for i686 though in a timely manner.
>>
>> Additionally, FESCo would like us to establish a minimum level of hardware
>>> supported. We are working on this list and will follow up with you once we
>>> have it completed. In the interim, we did want to address a couple of
>>> concerns that were passed along by Stephen Smoogen:
>>>
>>> * We have decided to drop support for PAE, so please feel free to disable
>>> it on the next build
>>> * We have decided to continue to support pre-SSE2 hardware for the time
>>> being
>>
>>
>> Done, rawhide going forward will drop PAE. Current stable Fedora releases
>> will continue to build PAE as it wouldn't be wise to drop support on an
>> existing release.
>
> This might require changes in Anaconda.  IIRC, it will look at the
> cpuflags during install and look to install the PAE kernel if that
> flag is present.  Unless the standard i686 kernel does a fake
> Provides, it might cause install issues if it's missing.  At least
> worth verifying.

I'm pretty sure it will, it'll also need changes in the lorax templates.

Peter
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to