This bug was fixed in the package xdp-tools - 1.5.1-1ubuntu2
---------------
xdp-tools (1.5.1-1ubuntu2) plucky; urgency=medium
* d/p/lp-2098005-*-Fix-incorrect-setsockopt-xdp_umem_reg-size.patch
(LP: #2098005).
* d/rules: Workaround for FTBFS caused by change in behavior in LLVM
toolchain (LP: #2103416).
* d/control: Use bpftool as dependency directly now that it has moved
to a separate binary package (LP: #2007308).
* d/xdp-tools.install.riscv64: Skip binaries missing due to no bpftool
on riscv64 (LP: #2106091).
-- Frode Nordahl <fnord...@ubuntu.com> Thu, 03 Apr 2025 05:33:23 +0000
** Changed in: xdp-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106091
Title:
Missing bpftool binary on riscv64
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in xdp-tools package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Bug description:
For other architectures there is now a separate bpftool binary
package, however on riscv64 there appears to neither be a bpftool
binary pacakge nor a bpftool binary in the linux-rsicv-tools package.
This is likely a side effect of [0]. How can we enable building of
the bpftool binary package also for riscv64?
0: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/plucky/commit/?h=master-
next&id=ca6b092bd0bf5a5f3534857d04fca9384a03783f
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2106091/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
