For the benefit of the subscribers to this bug, who may not be following
the corresponding e-mail thread in the linux-cifs mailing list:

This bug does not only affect SMB 1.0, but all SMB versions. It will
probably bite you if you specify a wsize mount option with a number of
bytes which is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE (usually 4 KiB, but not
always).

You can find out what the page size on your system is with command
"getconf PAGE_SIZE".

You do not actually have full control of the write buffer size, as it is
the result of a negotiation, so if the server happens to set a maximum
that is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE, and is lower than the maximum you
requested, you will probably end up with data corruption. Fortunately,
most modern servers appear to send unproblematic values, so that is why
this bug was discovered only when connecting to an old SMB 1.0 server.

There is a workaround for this bug. In my case, the connection
negotiated a wsize of 16580, even though the server should actually
default to 16644 bytes (?). I have specified a mount option of
wsize=16384, which is the next multiple of 4 KiB downwards, and
performed a quick test, and it looks fine. I'll shout here again if my
data gets corrupted once more.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049634

Title:
  smb1: wsize blocks of bytes followed with binary zeros on copy,
  destroying data

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Noble:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  Upon installing the 6.5 HWE kernel on Jammy, users with a custom wsize
  set will see data destruction when copying files from their systems
  onto a cifs smb 1.0 mount.

  wsize defaults to 65535 bytes, but when set to smaller values, like
  16850, users will see blocks of 16850 bytes copied over, followed by
  3900 binary zeros, followed by the next block of data followed by more
  binary zeros.

  A workaround is to increase wsize, but this only works for small
  files, as any files larger than wsize will see the bug.

  Most users will want to use the 6.2 HWE kernel until this is fixed.

  [Testcase]

  Start two VMs, one for the server, and the other, the client.

  Server
  ------

  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt upgrade
  $ sudo apt install samba
  $ sudo vim /etc/samba/smb.conf 
  server min protocol = NT1
  [sambashare]
      comment = Samba on Ubuntu
      path = /home/ubuntu/sambashare
      read only = no
      browsable = yes
  $ mkdir ~/sambashare
  $ sudo smbpasswd -a ubuntu

  Client
  ------

  $ sudo apt update
  $ sudo apt install cifs-utils
  $ mkdir ~/share
  $ sudo mount -t cifs -o username=ubuntu,vers=1.0,wsize=16850 
//192.168.122.172/sambashare ~/share
  $ ( set -o pipefail && head --bytes=$(( 55 * 1000 )) /dev/zero | openssl enc 
-aes-128-ctr -nosalt -pass "pass:my-seed" -iter 1 | hexdump --no-squeezing 
--format '40/1 "%02x"' --format '"\n"' >"testdata.txt" )
  $ sha256sum testdata.txt 
  9ec09af020dce3270ea76531141940106f173c7243b7193a553480fb8500b3f2  testdata.txt

  Now copy the file to the share.

  Client
  ------
  $ cp testdata.txt share/

  Server
  ------
  $ sha256sum sambashare/testdata.txt 
  9e573a0aa795f9cd4de4ac684a1c056dbc7d2ba5494d02e71b6225ff5f0fd866  
sambashare/testdata.txt

  The SHA256 hash is different. If you view the file with less, you will
  find a block of wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary zeros,
  followed by another wsize=16850 bytes, then 3900 bytes of binary
  zeros, etc.

  An example of a broken file is:
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/712573213/testdata-back-from-server.txt

  [Where problems could occur]

  [Other info]

  Currently bisecting. Introduced in 6.3-rc1. Currently broken on
  mainline 6.8-rc3.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2049634/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to