This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-oem-6.1/6.1.0-1017.17
kernel in https://launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-
team/+archive/ubuntu/proposed2 solves the problem. Please test the
kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved,
change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy' to 'verification-done-jammy'.
If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-jammy'
to 'verification-failed-jammy'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!

** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu Jammy)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => You-Sheng Yang (vicamo)

** Description changed:

+ [SRU Justification]
+ 
+ BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025670
+ 
+ [Impact]
+ 
+ Call trace dumped in events workqueue power_supply_changed_work, and
+ cpufreq locked to 400-544MHz.
+ 
+ ```
+ [   22.592162] Call Trace:
+ [   22.592164]  <TASK>
+ [   22.592164]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
+ [   22.592166]  ? __warn+0x81/0x130
+ [   22.592171]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
+ [   22.592172]  ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0
+ [   22.592175]  ? prb_read_valid+0x1b/0x30
+ [   22.592177]  ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80
+ [   22.592178]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
+ [   22.592179]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
+ [   22.592182]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
+ [   22.592183]  ? acpi_ut_delete_object_desc+0x86/0xb0
+ [   22.592186]  ? acpi_ut_update_ref_count.part.0+0x22d/0x930
+ [   22.592187]  __schedule+0xc0/0x1410
+ [   22.592189]  ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xa0
+ [   22.592191]  ? lapic_next_event+0x1d/0x30
+ [   22.592193]  ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x25b/0x350
+ [   22.592196]  schedule+0x5e/0xd0
+ [   22.592197]  schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xbe/0x140
+ [   22.592199]  ? __pfx_hrtimer_wakeup+0x10/0x10
+ [   22.592200]  usleep_range_state+0x64/0x90
+ [   22.592203]  amd_pmf_send_cmd+0x106/0x2a0 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
+ [   22.592207]  amd_pmf_update_slider+0x56/0x1b0 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
+ [   22.592210]  amd_pmf_set_sps_power_limits+0x72/0x80 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
+ [   22.592213]  amd_pmf_pwr_src_notify_call+0x49/0x90 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
+ [   22.592216]  notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0
+ [   22.592218]  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x32/0x50
+ ```
+ 
+ [Fix]
+ 
+ Upstream v6.4 fixed with commit
+ 
[146b6f6855e76](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-
+ drivers-x86.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=146b6f6855e7656e8329910606595220c761daac)
+ ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Register notify handler only if SPS is
+ enabled"). It has also been backported to stable trees v6.1.36 (oem-6.1
+ in v6.1.34 now), v6.2.15 (linux/lunar in v6.2.13 now), v6.3.10
+ (linux/mantic in v6.3.8 now).
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+ 1. boot with AC power cable connected
+ 2. unplug power cable and check cpufreq
+ 3. check no call trace found in dmesg
+ 
+ [Where problems could occur]
+ 
+ This patch installs only notify handler when the feature is fully
+ supported, so it's the right behavior.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ 
+ While we should receive this fix from stable fixes soon, nominate only
+ oem-6.1 to allow rolling out fix as soon as possible.
+ 
+ ========== original bug description ==========
+ 
  Upstream bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217571
  
  This is specifically when a system advertises support for PMF, but
  doesn't support static power slider for any reason.
  
  Upstream fix in
  
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/146b6f6855e7656e8329910606595220c761daac,
  which has been backported to v6.1.36 (oem-6.1 in v6.1.34 now), v6.2.15
  (linux/lunar in v6.2.13), v6.3.10 (linux/mantic in v6.3.8), v6.4.

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-6.1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025670

Title:
  amd_pmf: AMD 7840HS cpufreq locked at 400-544MHz after power unplugged

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Lunar:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Lunar:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Mantic:
  New
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Mantic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [SRU Justification]

  BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025670

  [Impact]

  Call trace dumped in events workqueue power_supply_changed_work, and
  cpufreq locked to 400-544MHz.

  ```
  [   22.592162] Call Trace:
  [   22.592164]  <TASK>
  [   22.592164]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
  [   22.592166]  ? __warn+0x81/0x130
  [   22.592171]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
  [   22.592172]  ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0
  [   22.592175]  ? prb_read_valid+0x1b/0x30
  [   22.592177]  ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x80
  [   22.592178]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
  [   22.592179]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
  [   22.592182]  ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x5e0/0x660
  [   22.592183]  ? acpi_ut_delete_object_desc+0x86/0xb0
  [   22.592186]  ? acpi_ut_update_ref_count.part.0+0x22d/0x930
  [   22.592187]  __schedule+0xc0/0x1410
  [   22.592189]  ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xa0
  [   22.592191]  ? lapic_next_event+0x1d/0x30
  [   22.592193]  ? hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x25b/0x350
  [   22.592196]  schedule+0x5e/0xd0
  [   22.592197]  schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0xbe/0x140
  [   22.592199]  ? __pfx_hrtimer_wakeup+0x10/0x10
  [   22.592200]  usleep_range_state+0x64/0x90
  [   22.592203]  amd_pmf_send_cmd+0x106/0x2a0 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
  [   22.592207]  amd_pmf_update_slider+0x56/0x1b0 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
  [   22.592210]  amd_pmf_set_sps_power_limits+0x72/0x80 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
  [   22.592213]  amd_pmf_pwr_src_notify_call+0x49/0x90 [amd_pmf 
bddfe0fe3712aaa99acce3d5487405c5213c6616]
  [   22.592216]  notifier_call_chain+0x5a/0xd0
  [   22.592218]  atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x32/0x50
  ```

  [Fix]

  Upstream v6.4 fixed with commit
  
[146b6f6855e76](https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-
  drivers-x86.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=146b6f6855e7656e8329910606595220c761daac)
  ("platform/x86/amd/pmf: Register notify handler only if SPS is
  enabled"). It has also been backported to stable trees v6.1.36
  (oem-6.1 in v6.1.34 now), v6.2.15 (linux/lunar in v6.2.13 now),
  v6.3.10 (linux/mantic in v6.3.8 now).

  [Test Case]

  1. boot with AC power cable connected
  2. unplug power cable and check cpufreq
  3. check no call trace found in dmesg

  [Where problems could occur]

  This patch installs only notify handler when the feature is fully
  supported, so it's the right behavior.

  [Other Info]

  While we should receive this fix from stable fixes soon, nominate only
  oem-6.1 to allow rolling out fix as soon as possible.

  ========== original bug description ==========

  Upstream bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217571

  This is specifically when a system advertises support for PMF, but
  doesn't support static power slider for any reason.

  Upstream fix in
  
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/146b6f6855e7656e8329910606595220c761daac,
  which has been backported to v6.1.36 (oem-6.1 in v6.1.34 now), v6.2.15
  (linux/lunar in v6.2.13), v6.3.10 (linux/mantic in v6.3.8), v6.4.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2025670/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to