This bug was fixed in the package linux-aws - 4.15.0-1114.121

---------------
linux-aws (4.15.0-1114.121) bionic; urgency=medium

  * bionic/linux-aws: 4.15.0-1114.121 -proposed tracker (LP: #1947356)

  [ Ubuntu: 4.15.0-161.169 ]

  * bionic/linux: 4.15.0-161.169 -proposed tracker (LP: #1947358)
  * Bionic/linux-aws Boot failure downgrading from Bionic/linux-aws-5.4 on
    r5.metal (LP: #1946149)
    - SAUCE: Revert "PCI/MSI: Enforce MSI[X] entry updates to be visible"
    - SAUCE: Revert "PCI/MSI: Enforce that MSI-X table entry is masked for 
update"

 -- Ian May <ian....@canonical.com>  Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:11:04 -0500

** Changed in: linux-aws (Ubuntu Bionic)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-aws in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944754

Title:
   linux-tools-aws package does not contain libperf-jvmti.so

Status in linux-aws package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-aws source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-aws source package in Impish:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  SRU Justification

  [Impact]
  For debugging purposes, on EC2, people will install linux-tools-$(uname -r) 
to help with debugging the system. This selects the kernel specific linux-tools 
package, and for the AWS variant, we are missing the library libperf-jvmti.so 
to enable tracing Java applications with perf.

  To get a libperf-jvmti.so library, we need to perform an additional
  and confusing step by installing linux-tools-generic to get a copy of
  the library. Customers on AWS EC2 should not have to do this. We would
  like the linux-tools-aws packages to contain libperf-jvmti.so.

  [Test Plan]

  Install linux-tools-aws, check for libperf-jvmti.so

  [Where problems could occur]

  Given that linux-tools-aws installs in a versioned (unique) directory,
  there should be no conflicts or possibility of regression.

  [Additional info]

  SF: #00319833

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-aws/+bug/1944754/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to