Hi Matthew and all,

thank you for taking action immediately. I really appreciate your
effort.

After investigating the issue further I have to add that the mount
option discard seems to trigger the issue, too.

@Trent
The general problem here is that RAID10 can balance single read streams to all 
disks (which is probably the major advantage over RAID1 effectively providing 
you RAID0 read speed; RAID1 needs parallel reads to achieve this).

That said it is no big surprise that several machines at our site went to 
readonly mode after *some time* (probably reading some filesystem relevant data 
from the "bad disk"). Unfortunately the "clean first disk" only happens if you 
act immediately, otherwise you might have some data corruption.
I verified this on one system where the root partition was affected using the 
debsums tool (just run debsums -xa) after fixing FS errors.

My procedure to recover was:
Assembly of the RAID:
mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/nvme0n1p2
mdadm --run /dev/md127

Filesystem check on all partitions (note the -f parameter, some FS "think" they 
are clean):
fsck.ext4 -f /dev/VolGroup/...

Re-add the second component:
mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/nvme1n1p2
mdadm --add /dev/md127 /dev/nvme1n1p2

Best regards

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907262

Title:
  raid10: discard leads to corrupted file system

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  Seems to be closely related to
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1896578

  After updating the Ubuntu 18.04 kernel from 4.15.0-124 to 4.15.0-126
  the fstrim command triggered by fstrim.timer causes a severe number of
  mismatches between two RAID10 component devices.

  This bug affects several machines in our company with different HW
  configurations (All using ECC RAM). Both, NVMe and SATA SSDs are
  affected.

  How to reproduce:
   - Create a RAID10 LVM and filesystem on two SSDs
      mdadm -C -v -l10 -n2 -N "lv-raid" -R /dev/md0 /dev/nvme0n1p2 
/dev/nvme1n1p2
      pvcreate -ff -y /dev/md0
      vgcreate -f -y VolGroup /dev/md0
      lvcreate -n root    -L 100G -ay -y VolGroup
      mkfs.ext4 /dev/VolGroup/root
      mount /dev/VolGroup/root /mnt
   - Write some data, sync and delete it
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/data.raw bs=4K count=1M
      sync
      rm /mnt/data.raw
   - Check the RAID device
      echo check >/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
   - After finishing (see /proc/mdstat), check the mismatch_cnt (should be 0):
      cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt
   - Trigger the bug
      fstrim /mnt
   - Re-Check the RAID device
      echo check >/sys/block/md0/md/sync_action
   - After finishing (see /proc/mdstat), check the mismatch_cnt (probably in 
the range of N*10000):
      cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt

  After investigating this issue on several machines it *seems* that the
  first drive does the trim correctly while the second one goes wild. At
  least the number and severity of errors found by a  USB stick live
  session fsck.ext4 suggests this.

  To perform the single drive evaluation the RAID10 was started using a single 
drive at once:
    mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/nvme0n1p2
    mdadm --run /dev/md127
    fsck.ext4 -n -f /dev/VolGroup/root

    vgchange -a n /dev/VolGroup
    mdadm --stop /dev/md127

    mdadm --assemble /dev/md127 /dev/nvme1n1p2
    mdadm --run /dev/md127
    fsck.ext4 -n -f /dev/VolGroup/root

  When starting these fscks without -n, on the first device it seems the
  directory structure is OK while on the second device there is only the
  lost+found folder left.

  Side-note: Another machine using HWE kernel 5.4.0-56 (after using -53
  before) seems to have a quite similar issue.

  Unfortunately the risk/regression assessment in the aforementioned bug
  is not complete: the workaround only mitigates the issues during FS
  creation. This bug on the other hand is triggered by a weekly service
  (fstrim) causing severe file system corruption.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1907262/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to