The new update to "cpufreqd" now also build-depends on libcpupower-dev.
This is more common to be used, so the prio slightly increases IMHO.

OTOH cpufreqd already has delta, and we might as well try to build differently.
The package seems community/foundations maintained, but not in main.
Adding a bug task for it.

The Debian package has no git VCS entry to check when/why they changed
build deps.


$ rma cpufreqd
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2       | oldoldstable   | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2       | oldstable      | source
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2       | stable         | source
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2+b1    | oldstable      | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, 
mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2+b2    | stable         | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, 
mips, mips64el, mipsel, s390x
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2.3     | testing        | source, amd64, arm64, armel, 
armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, s390x
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2.3     | unstable       | source, amd64, arm64, armel, 
armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, s390x
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2.3     | unstable-debug | source
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2.3+b1  | testing        | ppc64el
cpufreqd   | 2.4.2-2.3+b1  | unstable       | ppc64el

 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-1          | precise/universe         | source, amd64, armel, 
armhf, i386, powerpc
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu1   | trusty/universe          | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu1   | xenial/universe          | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu2   | bionic/universe          | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu3   | eoan/universe            | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu3   | focal/universe           | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2ubuntu3   | groovy/universe          | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 cpufreqd | 2.4.2-2.2ubuntu1 | groovy-proposed/universe | source, amd64, arm64, 
armhf, riscv64, s390x


** Also affects: cpufreqd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891336

Title:
  gkrellm2-cpufreq depends on libcpupower-dev produced by Debian kernel

Status in cpufreqd package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in gkrellm2-cpufreq package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I don't know how important that is as gkrellm2-cpufreq itself is scheduled 
for removal.
  But I wanted to make sure that it is known that the Debian kernel produces 
"libcpupower-dev" which isn't available in Ubuntu and thereby blocking various 
things in proposed.

  
  root@d10-sid:~# apt-cache show libcpupower-dev
  Package: libcpupower-dev
  Source: linux
  Version: 5.7.10-1
  Installed-Size: 169
  Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-ker...@lists.debian.org>
  Architecture: amd64
  Replaces: libcpufreq-dev
  Provides: libcpufreq-dev
  Depends: libcpupower1 (= 5.7.10-1)
  Conflicts: libcpufreq-dev
  Description-en: CPU frequency and voltage scaling tools for Linux 
(development files)
   libcpupower is a library for inspecting and controlling cpufreq and
   cpuidle tunables.
   .
   This package is needed to compile programs against libcpupower.


  gkrellm2-cpufreq will most likely be removed from goovy as it makes no sense 
without that build-dep.
  Never the less the kernel Team could evaluate if providing "libcpupower-dev" 
makes sense for Ubuntu.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cpufreqd/+bug/1891336/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to