Launchpad has imported 38 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108619.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-18T14:20:40+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: Created attachment 134111 starting backtrace with scalc I started scalc V6.0.0.0alpha1 with backtrace and it crashed its not always reproduced Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T12:54:57+00:00 Beluga wrote: René Engelhard pointed to something similar: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=i386&ver=1%3A5.3.4-1&stamp=1498442560&raw=0) #0 0xead28975 in _expand_stack_to(unsigned char*) () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so He commented: "Linux's stack clash fixes break Java (and thus whenever LO tries to use Java)" Not sure, if related. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T13:01:59+00:00 Michael-stahl wrote: the JVM regularly receives SIGSEGV especially during startup, and that is annoying but not a problem at all. if Calc does indeed crash, that must be a later SIGSEGV that is not handled by the JVM. please attach a backtrace of the last SIGSEGV i.e. the one that is in LO code and isn't handled by JVM. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T14:42:31+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: thanks for the info and i have tested with openjdk7 and no crashes anymore second i fond that it loaded the file faster than with openjdk8 thanks again Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T15:30:59+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: Sorry is spoke to soon crashes with openjdk7 i have backtrace and strace logs Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T15:32:07+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: Created attachment 134315 bactrace for openjdk7 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T15:33:16+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: Created attachment 134316 strace for openjdk wil test without java in advance options Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-06-27T15:42:06+00:00 Xv3247 wrote: i have downloaded the 5.3.4.2 and there are is no crash now i don't now anymore Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T15:53:22+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote: That specific crash has been reported both on debian (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865303) and ubuntu (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1702165). It started happening with a recent linux kernel update related to stack clash fixes (see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1699772). Subsequent kernel updates appear to have fixed all userspace apps affected by that crash, except for libreoffice on x86, which is still crashing. Libreoffice on x86-64 is fine. I can reliably reproduce the crash in an Ubuntu 17.04 x86 virtual machine by ensuring that java is enabled in libreoffice's advanced options (using the openjdk-8 package), launching base and creating a new database. A full backtrace with debug symbols is available there: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/326892034/libreoffice-base-zesty-full- backtrace.txt. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T15:54:47+00:00 Olivier Tilloy wrote: Created attachment 134497 full backtrace with debug symbols of base crashing at database creation Attaching the full backtrace I mentioned above. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T17:40:58+00:00 Norbert wrote: Created attachment 134499 backtrace for LibreOffice Writer 5.2.7.2 on Debian Stretch x86 This problem was discovered in LibreOffice Writer 5.2.7.2 on Debian Stretch (see for example my backtrace at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865303#220 ) or in attachment. In brief: #0 0xa904a975 in _expand_stack_to(address) (bottom=0xbf805fff <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805fff>, bottom@entry=0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000>) at ./src/hotspot/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:673 sp = 0xbfffcc88 "\r" size = 8350857 p = 0xbf805fe0 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805fe0> #1 0xa904d184 in os::Linux::manually_expand_stack(JavaThread*, unsigned char*) (t=0x8106c800, addr=0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000>) at ./src/hotspot/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:686 mask_all = {__val = {2147483647, 4294967294, 4294967295 <repeats 30 times>}} old_sigset = {__val = {0, 0, 3221212536, 3221212568, 2829768134, 96, 3221212536, 2835641696, 3017451961, 2164710288, 2164710288, 2839724032, 2835430804, 2164710320, 2837838588, 63, 2835430768, 2839724032, 2164717328, 3221212616, 2835654623, 2164710288, 0, 2837838588, 1, 180, 3221212616, 2835654507, 2839724032, 2164717328, 2164717328, 3221212648}} t = 0x8106c800 addr = 0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000> I do not know how many users use Java in Writer, but it is enabled by default and Writer silently crashes. It's critical bug! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T19:52:40+00:00 Norbert wrote: Created attachment 134502 backtrace for LibreOffice Base 5.2.7.2 on Debian Stretch x86 Base in Debian Stretch x86 is affected too (see https://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865303#225 ). I ran "gdb --args /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin --base", 'run', in Database Wizard selected 'Create a new database', 'Embedded database:' -> 'HSQLDB Embedded', click 'Next', click 'Finish', save database file in /tmp/db.odb. Backtrace in brief: #0 0xa24e7975 in _expand_stack_to(address) (bottom=0xbf805fff <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805fff>, bottom@entry=0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000>) at ./src/hotspot/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:673 sp = 0xbfffc6c8 "\r" size = 8349385 p = 0xbf805fe0 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805fe0> #1 0xa24ea184 in os::Linux::manually_expand_stack(JavaThread*, unsigned char*) (t=0x8112d800, addr=0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000>) at ./src/hotspot/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:686 mask_all = {__val = {2147483647, 4294967294, 4294967295 <repeats 30 times>}} old_sigset = {__val = {0, 0, 3221211064, 3221211096, 2717164998, 96, 3221211064, 2723038560, 3017451961, 2165500688, 2165500688, 2727120896, 2722827668, 2165500720, 2725235452, 63, 2722827632, 2727120896, 2165500504, 3221211144, 2723051487, 2165500688, 0, 2725235452, 1, 180, 3221211144, 2723051371, 2727120896, 2165500504, 2165500504, 3221211176}} t = 0x8112d800 addr = 0xbf805000 <error: Cannot access memory at address 0xbf805000> Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T21:32:10+00:00 Norbert wrote: LibreOffice Base 5.3.1.2 on Ubuntu 17.04 x86 is affected too. I can't get backtrace here. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T21:38:49+00:00 Norbert wrote: Created attachment 134504 backtrace for LibreOffice Writer 5.1.6.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS x86 LibreOffice Base 5.1.6.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS x86 is affected too. See attached backtrace (jfw_plugin_startJavaVirtualMachine is mentioned here). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-05T21:49:16+00:00 Norbert wrote: It seems that bug may be fixed soon in kernel (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/3/1008 ), not in LibreOffice. I'm sorry for the noise. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-10T12:25:49+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: (In reply to Norbert X from comment #14) > It seems that bug may be fixed soon in kernel (see > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/3/1008 ), not in LibreOffice. > I'm sorry for the noise. Thank your very much for investigating it. I guess we can close this as RESOLVED NOTOURBUG Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/54 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-24T02:49:50+00:00 Luke wrote: There are 2 workarounds for this issue: Add kernel parameter stack_guard_gap=1 Or Start Libreoffice, click on Tools, click on options and under Libreoffice section click on Advanced. And instead of changing parameteres, considering I don't use java in Libreoffice, I've simply deselected "Use a Java runtime environment". from: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=227597 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/59 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-25T14:52:56+00:00 Cloph-0 wrote: pointers to the openjdk code / showing why only 32bit is affected https://www.mail-archive.com/linux- ker...@vger.kernel.org/msg1437925.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/60 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-28T11:52:07+00:00 Michael-stahl wrote: *** Bug 109327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/66 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-31T11:54:44+00:00 Iplaw67-h wrote: *** Bug 108854 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/68 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-07-31T11:54:52+00:00 Iplaw67-h wrote: *** Bug 109101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/69 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-03T08:19:49+00:00 Iplaw67-h wrote: *** Bug 110748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-08-16T11:34:28+00:00 Michael-stahl wrote: *** Bug 109014 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/72 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-13T08:34:12+00:00 Iplaw67-h wrote: *** Bug 112357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/75 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-19T07:40:09+00:00 Iplaw67-h wrote: *** Bug 112479 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/76 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-23T16:23:01+00:00 Luke wrote: The build time manifestation of this bug is a CppunitTest_dbaccess_hsqldb_test or CppunitTest_dbaccess_RowSetClones test failure. For details see: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/CppunitTest-dbaccess-hsqldb-test- CppunitTest-dbaccess-RowSetClones-Failing-after-System-Update- td4218769.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-10-08T10:17:39+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: *** Bug 112930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-10-29T20:19:49+00:00 julien2412 wrote: *** Bug 113491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/83 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-11-17T18:55:53+00:00 Beluga wrote: *** Bug 113904 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/84 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-12-25T16:52:05+00:00 Mikekaganski wrote: *** Bug 114689 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-01-07T20:13:46+00:00 Mikekaganski wrote: *** Bug 114898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/86 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-01-10T10:13:13+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: *** Bug 114639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-01-10T10:15:56+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: *** Bug 114638 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-01-12T12:50:13+00:00 Aron Budea wrote: *** Bug 114977 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/89 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-01-12T13:04:15+00:00 Jan-Peter Rühmann wrote: Why then every other Java Programm not showing errors? LibreOffice is the only one. Thanks, Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/90 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-02-11T20:06:59+00:00 julien2412 wrote: *** Bug 115631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-02-13T11:57:42+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: *** Bug 115222 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2018-07-18T21:39:21+00:00 Xiscofauli wrote: *** Bug 118677 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1699772/comments/122 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699772 Title: linux-image-4.13.0-12-generic, linux-image-4.10.0-24-generic, linux- image-4.8.0-56-generic, linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic, linux- image-3.13.0-121-generic | Regression: many user-space apps crashing Status in LibreOffice: Won't Fix Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in linux source package in Xenial: Incomplete Status in linux source package in Artful: Won't Fix Status in linux source package in Bionic: Incomplete Status in linux package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: Distribution: Ubuntu 16.04 x64 (Flavour: KDE Neon User Edition 5.10) linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic appears to contain a regression, probably related to the CVE-2017-1000364 fix backport / patch. Using this kernel, the Oracle Java browser plugin always crashes during stack-related actions on initialization. This means, the plugin completely stopped working. It works perfectly fine in linux-image-4.4.0-79-generic (vurlerable to CVE-2017-1000364) as well as linux-image-4.11.6-041106-generic, which also contains a fix for CVE-2017-1000364. uname -a: > Linux Zweiblum 4.4.0-81-generic #104-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jun 14 08:17:06 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I tested Oracle Java 1.8 u131 as well as 1.6 u64 in Firefox 51.0.1 as well as Iceweasel / Firefox/3.5.16 in a chroot. Using linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic it crashes in all combinations while with both other kernels it works. I was not able to obtain any detailed crash information from Firefox 51.0.1, but Iceweasel 3.5.16 crashed completely, allowing me to obtain a stack trace which shows the relation to stack operations performed by the plugin, even without proper debug symbols: > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x00007fa06d805307 in _expand_stack_to(unsigned char*) () from /opt/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x00007fa06d8053ae in os::Linux::manually_expand_stack(JavaThread*, unsigned char*) () > from /opt/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > No symbol table info available. > #2 0x00007fa06d80cf0b in JVM_handle_linux_signal () from /opt/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > No symbol table info available. > #3 0x00007fa06d802e13 in signalHandler(int, siginfo*, void*) () from /opt/java-8-oracle/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so > No symbol table info available. > #4 <signal handler called> I first assumed a bug in the Java plugin, but it works fine in Linux 4.11.6. The crash will be triggered by any applet, for example the test applet at: * https://java.com/en/download/installed8.jsp I'm running the Ubuntu 16.04 based KDE Neon distribution which somehow apparently does not allow me to use apport to report this bug: > $ LANG= apport-cli linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic > > *** Collecting problem information > > The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the > application. This might take a few minutes. > ......... > > *** Problem in linux-image-4.4.0-81-generic > > The problem cannot be reported: > > This is not an official KDE package. Please remove any third party package and try again. If someone can tell me how to get apport working for this package, I can use it to collect additional information, but (unfortunately?) the problem should be fairly easy to reproduce... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1699772/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
