This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
artful' to 'verification-done-artful'. If the problem still exists,
change the tag 'verification-needed-artful' to 'verification-failed-
artful'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will
be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how
to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!


** Tags added: verification-needed-artful

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762812

Title:
  /dev/ipmi enumeration flaky on Cavium Sabre nodes

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Artful:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  There are several stability issues with the i2c-xlp9xxx that cause 
communication issues between the host and the BMC, leading to unpredictable 
results when the ipmi-ssif module tries to enumerate the device (/dev/ipmi0).

  [Test Case]
  Reboot the system several times, each time verifying that /dev/ipmi0 is 
present and functional (e.g. using 'sudo ipmitool lan print').
  *** Note that systems need to be running firmware 6.2 or greater ***

  [Regression Risk]
  All patches are clean cherry picks from upstream, restricted to a driver that 
is only used on this platform in Ubuntu (also used on some MIPS platforms, for 
which we have no port).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1762812/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to