Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434629.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-02-23T16:14:27+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/12

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-02-23T16:22:12+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

Very sorry hit enter by mistake...

Description of problem:
My gigabit ethernet card used to work with kernel before 2.6.24, now it doesn't

Additional info:
lspci -v:
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI
Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01)
        Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device 11f5
        Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 11
        I/O ports at c800 [size=256]
        Memory at dcfff000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
        Expansion ROM at dcfe0000 [disabled] [size=64K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
        Capabilities: [48] Vital Product Data <?>
        Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/1 
Enable-
        Capabilities: [60] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
        Capabilities: [84] Vendor Specific Information <?>
        Kernel driver in use: r8169

relevant dmesg:
...
eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xffffc2000001e000, 00:18:f3:32:78:91, XID 38000000 IRQ 
11
...
r8169: eth0: link up

Which is exactly identical to what it said in 2.6.23...


Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/13

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-02-26T21:18:50+00:00 Vaclav wrote:

Can you post the latest kernel version you have tried? Also please send output
from ifconfig, ethtool.
If you have time and can still reproduce the bug with the latest kernel version,
please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugsAndFeatureRequests and add a more
precise description to this bug.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/14

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-02-29T15:25:52+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

Created attachment 296365
ethtool output

Please forgive me for the lack of detail in initial report, I had no time to
deeply test anything.

- Latest kernel I've tried is 2.6.24-2.fc9 (from the livecd) both 32 and 64
bits

attached ethtool

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/15

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-02-29T21:56:41+00:00 Vaclav wrote:

I suppose, you are using DHCP right? Please try to assign a fixed IP address for
adapter and try it again. Also try to use the latest kernel, as rawhide is a
moving target and it can be broken in some older versions :-). I have similar
network card in my ntb and it works correctly with the last kernels.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/22

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-01T11:29:41+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

Yes, I was using DHCP. I've also tried static IP, but the results are the same 
(except tha pinging the router makes its led to blink, but still "Destination 
host Unreachable")
Latest fedora kernel does not boot, sorry I cannot try it...
Anyway, A friend of mine which has my same notebook (Asus A6T) and uses Gentoo 
told me that he is having the same problem, from 2.6.24 to whatever is the 
latest version of vanilla-sources (2.6.25.?)...
If it's really the same problem, then it's not fedora specific, should I file 
a bug at kernel.org?

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/23

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-02T13:55:55+00:00 Vaclav wrote:

Oh I nearly forgot. Is there anything interesting in /var/log/messages? I
noticed also some similar bugreport on debian list with the same notebook type.
Please also try to boot with acpi=off if that works, narrowing down by trying
pci=noacpi instead. You should also try it with the latest kernel, it should
make them bootable for you again.


Reply at: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/24

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-02T22:14:42+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

Argh, I remember there are many errors regarding many different, and I hope 
unrelated problems, including at least the following (quoting from memory, 
I'll send precise output ASAP, away from home now...)
-various kinds of ACPI errors, both with acpi=off and pci=noacpi
-various other APIC errors: I have to use "noapic" to get anything below 
2.6.23 to boot (known problem for this laptop... :( ), 2.6.24 on the other 
hand, boots even without this... hmmm...
-something being not E820-reserved
-tons of repeated lines of complaints about ata1, which I will do you the 
favour of removing, because they make the rest unreadable

In spite of all the above, my machine worked *just fine* until now...

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/25

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-10T22:47:11+00:00 Jay wrote:

I can confirm that the kernel upgrade had the same effect on my system; works
correctly under the prior kernel, the latest upgrade broke it.  Let me know what
additional steps you'd like me to take; DHCP is broken, haven't attempted a
static assignment yet but can.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/26

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-25T16:34:18+00:00 Nicolò wrote:

WORKS, at least for me,
F9-Beta, 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 (why don't you use simpler version 
numbers? ;-)

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/29

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-03-25T17:30:28+00:00 Vaclav wrote:

Great, I'm closing it with rawhide resolution.

Reply at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/181081/comments/30


** Changed in: linux (Fedora)
   Importance: Unknown => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/181081

Title:
  Fix MSI mapping quirk on HT-based nVidia platform

Status in Linux:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Hardy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Intrepid:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Fedora:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: nic-modules-2.6.24-2-generic-di

  My network controller can not get an ip from dhcp after installing the 7th 
December build of Ubuntu Hardy.
  First I thought it because of this bug 
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/124086 but after testing the cdrom 
on a different computer (where everything worked) I understood that it's a 
problem with my r8169 module on hardy release kernel 2.6.24. 

  My network controller after lspci is:
  02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B 
PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01)

  The system I own is an Asus A6M laptop, with AMD 64bit CPU on an
  NForce2 motherboard.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/181081/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to