Launchpad has imported 13 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489078.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-07T05:25:26+00:00 sangu wrote: Description of problem: $ dmesg | grep vmap vmap allocation for size 4198400 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 4198400 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 2101248 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 1052672 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 528384 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 520192 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 303104 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. vmap allocation for size 7880704 failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.6.29-0.207.rc7.fc11 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Xorg doesn't start Swap partition doesn't be mounted Expected results: Additional info: No problem in x86_64. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-07T05:26:18+00:00 sangu wrote: Created attachment 334383 dmesg Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-16T00:36:33+00:00 sangu wrote: This bug still happens in kernel-PAE-2.6.29-0.252.rc8.fc11.i686. No problem in 2.6.29-0.157.rc6.git2.fc11.i686.PAE and recent all x86_64 kernel. < hw profile : http://www.smolts.org/show?uuid=pub_63e477cc-5ada-41f1 -b36d-074ad08f0636 > Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-17T00:04:35+00:00 sangu wrote: 9800 GT and 8300 mGPU in my linux box. Disabling mGPU (in mainboard) -> This problem doesn't appear. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-17T02:33:44+00:00 sangu wrote: (In reply to comment #3) > 9800 GT and 8300 mGPU in my linux box. > Disabling mGPU (in mainboard) -> This problem doesn't appear. swap partition is mounted. then gdm doesn't start. So, after disabling nouveau kernel module, starting X works well. nouveau kernel module conflicts with nvidia (proprietary) driver in i686(x86). Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-25T04:53:42+00:00 Ben wrote: With two G8x series cards nouveau will be using a lot (at least 96MiB between both cards) of vmalloc space. How do things go if you take the advice the kernel gives and add "vmalloc=256M" to your kernel commandline? I'll also look into ways we can reduce the amount of vmalloc space we consume. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-26T13:11:04+00:00 sangu wrote: (In reply to comment #5) >How do things go if you take the advice the > kernel gives and add "vmalloc=256M" to your kernel commandline? After adding vmalloc=256M in kernel commandline, 2 gpu work well in kernel-PAE-2.6.29-0.267.rc8.git4.fc11.i686. $ dmesg | grep vmalloc Kernel command line: ro root=UUID=7fb39964-2a89-4978-87a5-deca9f9b732b vmalloc=256M vmalloc : 0xef7fe000 - 0xff7fe000 ( 256 MB) swap_cgroup: uses 1008 bytes of vmalloc for pointer array space and 1032192 bytes to hold mem_cgroup pointers on swap Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-09T11:58:41+00:00 Bug wrote: This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/77 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-10T22:00:10+00:00 Mike wrote: I encountered the same problem with my Dell XPS m1330 laptop. It has the nVidia Geforce 8400 GS 128MB video card. I was able to load X just fine when using the default 'nv' driver, but attempting to use the latest NVIDIA-Linux-x86-185.18.14-pkg1.run driver, or the kmod-nvidia-PAE packaged version, X wouldn't load and I'd end up with a black screen. This is with a clean install of F11 32bit (using the official DVD install released 20090609). Kernel: 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE Adding "vmalloc=128MB" to /etc/grub.conf followed by a reboot got things working. X loaded and glxinfo indicates that direct rendering is enabled. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/80 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-10T22:10:51+00:00 Mike wrote: I suppose I should state that my laptop has a single GPU Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/81 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-24T01:51:31+00:00 Ben wrote: Any update from either of you guy as to whether this works by default in F11? I believe for your cases it should've been fixed before release, I reduced our vmalloc space usage as much as possible. Any further issues are unavoidable, NVIDIA cards simply have very large register apertures and chew a lot of address space. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/88 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-27T13:07:44+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-06-28T11:24:56+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/341952/comments/103 ** Changed in: fedora Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: fedora Importance: Unknown => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341952 Title: ath5k locks up system in jaunty - "ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout" Status in Bugzilla: Invalid Status in Linux: Fix Released Status in linux package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in linux package in Baltix: New Status in Fedora: Won't Fix Bug description: After upgrading to jaunty I started experiencing frequent system/x server freezes. Happens all of a sudden with X session completely frozen with no keys working, including SysRq. Hard reboot is necessary. It is hard to tell what is the reason. Tried to examine the logs - doesn't give me a clue. There are a number of suspicious entries in the /var/log/dmesg* though All of them except for the current and the oldest ones are all ENDING with this: vmap allocation failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. Like: ~$ zgrep 'vmap' /var/log/dmesg* -A5 /var/log/dmesg.0:[ 35.911114] vmap allocation failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. /var/log/dmesg.1.gz:[ 31.707600] vmap allocation failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. /var/log/dmesg.2.gz:[ 38.358206] vmap allocation failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. /var/log/dmesg.3.gz:[ 91.715889] vmap allocation failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase size. Also I can recall that my memory icon in the gnome-system-monitor was filled (light and dark green ) at the time of crashes. uname -a Linux jenshen 2.6.28-8-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 5 21:49:36 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux I will also attach some files like dmesg, and logs if needed Thanks in advance To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugzilla/+bug/341952/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
