For each kernel a message catalogue is available for s390x.
For better servicablity, customers asking for having this kernel messages as 
part of the distribution.

Incorrect package name. Please blacklist "kernel-package" in the
bugproxy bridge.

Please open new bug against "linux" package.

Please add a public link to the patch and message catalogue - thx.

Ideally a public git repository that the kernel team may pull from.

Said git repository should be kept up to date w.r.t. upstream linus rc releases 
& stable point release.
Latest msg catalogue can be found for kernel 4.7
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/kernel-4.7.html#message-catalog

Ubuntu yakkety and zesty are on 4.8, patch for 4.7 does apply albeit with fuzz.
The fact that it's behind a captive portal, prevents automating 
pulling/rebasing this patch.
Can you please publish a git tree for the message catalog on github.com, 
launchpad.net, kernel.org?

Heinz - can I get this as a regular git patch with proper provenance ?
Tim - the msg catalogue will be provided via developerworks, like all the other 
kernel contributions for s390x.
As an example please see here for kernel 4.8.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html

I cannot include patches that have no provenance and require EULA assent
from the download web page.

If there is no public repository, it will cause conflicts when merging
and preparing new kernel releases.

Please provide public git repository which is rebased on devel rc
milestones, starting from -rc1. Because canonical kernel team starts
integration of new kernels from -rc1. Previously the "developerworks"
downloads where severely out of date. And e.g. 4.9 catalog was not
public until well after the final release.

The benefit of this patch is also dubious. It may be well known to s390x
users; but not to the generic Linux users who are starting to use s390x.
Have you considered contributing regular kernel manpages and
documentation upstream instead of changing the codepaths that affect all
architectures?

I'm inclined to reject applying the message catalog patch, as it will be
a maintainance burden on the canonical kernel team delaying kernel
maintainance and the -rc rebases, whilst providing little overall
benefit. But it's up to the kernel team to accept/reject this
patch/feature.

Committed to the unstable kernel (v4.10-rc4)

@rtg

Please check if
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/log/?h
=kernel-messages suitable to pull the kernel-messages from. Please note,
it may require repulls with later milestones (e.g. rc4 or later).

This kernel-messages branch needs to be refactored for v4.10-rc6 as it does not 
cherry-pick cleanly.
Rebased the kernel-message branch on kernel.org to 4.10-rc6. This applied with 
a simple 'git am' without any hickups.

Oops, I had already applied a previous kernel-messages commit which is
why the commit at the top of your branch would not apply. I've now
cherry-picked from the v4.10-rc6 version and pushed to unstable (which
will soon become Zesty 17.04).

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.10.0-8.10

---------------
linux (4.10.0-8.10) zesty; urgency=low

[ Tim Gardner ]

* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #1664217

* [Hyper-V] Bug fixes for storvsc (tagged queuing, error conditions)
(LP: #1663687)
- scsi: storvsc: Enable tracking of queue depth
- scsi: storvsc: Remove the restriction on max segment size
- scsi: storvsc: Enable multi-queue support
- scsi: storvsc: use tagged SRB requests if supported by the device
- scsi: storvsc: properly handle SRB_ERROR when sense message is present
- scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

* Ubuntu16.10-KVM:Big configuration with multiple guests running SRIOV VFs
caused KVM host hung and all KVM guests down. (LP: #1651248)
- KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS cleanup: remove XICS_RM_REJECT
- KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: correct the real mode ICP rejecting counter
- KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Fix potential issue with duplicate IRQ resends
- KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Implement ICS P/Q states
- KVM: PPC: Book 3S: XICS: Don't lock twice when checking for resend

* overlay: mkdir fails if directory exists in lowerdir in a user namespace
(LP: #1531747)
- SAUCE: overlayfs: Skip permission checking for trusted.overlayfs.* xattrs

* CVE-2016-1575 (LP: #1534961)
- SAUCE: overlayfs: Skip permission checking for trusted.overlayfs.* xattrs

* CVE-2016-1576 (LP: #1535150)
- SAUCE: overlayfs: Skip permission checking for trusted.overlayfs.* xattrs

* Miscellaneous Ubuntu changes
- SAUCE: md/raid6 algorithms: scale test duration for speedier boots
- SAUCE: Import aufs driver
- d-i: Build message-modules udeb for arm64
- rebase to v4.10-rc8

* Miscellaneous upstream changes
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: aufs -- remove .readlink assignment"
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: (no-up) aufs: for v4.9-rc1, support setattr_prepare()"
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: aufs -- Add flags argument to aufs_rename()"
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: aufs -- Convert to use xattr handlers"
- Revert "UBUNTU: SAUCE: Import aufs driver"

[ Upstream Kernel Changes ]

* rebase to v4.10-rc8

-- Tim Gardner <tim.gard...@canonical.com>  Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:34:24
-0700

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628889

Title:
  [17.04 FEAT] Integrate kernel message catalogue for s390x into Ubuntu
  distribution

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  For each kernel a message catalogue is available for s390x.
  For better servicablity, customers asking for having this kernel messages as 
part of the distribution.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1628889/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to