Remi Ferrand <[email protected]> writes: > No problem at all, feel free to change the ACL scheme name. From my > point of view "unixgroup" is more suited in this very case as > "localgroup" could be confusing for people that would like to use some > other "groups" backends (non local ones) also supported by libnss such > as LDAP; but I agree with your "local" argument that explicits the > "principal" to "local version" translation.
> I would say that as long as the documentation (man page) is explicit > enough (I should have written some more maybe), whatever the name is, > users will understand what they could use this ACL scheme for. Thank you very much for this work! I have now finally merged it and pushed out a new release, as you probably just saw. Unfortunately, we use Gerrit internally in a way that doesn't work well with merges, so the line of development doesn't look like a merge of your branch in Github. (There are ways to fix this, but they were all too complex than I had time for.) But your patches, rebased, are in there, along with some subsequent refactoring. I haven't had a chance to take a look at the PTS ACL code yet, unfortunately. I have a few other things queued up to look at before I'll get a chance to poke at it. > Perfect, thank you for that, and more personnaly I'd like to thank you > for you work on the whole remctl project. > In daily tasks, it's just a real pleasure to work with your software, > and it was actually the same pleasure for me to dig into the source code > and extand it :-) Thank you very much! -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
