On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 19:26 -0500, Greg Hudson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 17:56 -0500, Jaap Winius wrote: > > Does anyone have any idea when MIT Kerberos is likely to include support > > for the _kerberos-adm._tcp SRV resource record? > > > My tests with the packages that currently come with Debian squeeze > > suggest that this particular DNS functionality is still lacking. Could > > this be one of the reasons why Heimdal is often used instead? > > What tests are you running? We've had support for this for quite some > time, at least as far back as 1.4.
A little more investigation indicates that we use _kerberos-adm SRV records for password changes, but not for the kadmin client. I don't know if this is a particularly strong driver of implementation choice as you suggest, but I'll make a note to try to implement this for 1.10. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
