>>>>> "Ken" == Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is also worth noting, that, while Heimdal is not thread safe
>> (at least there are no guarantees), it has proven to be much
>> more thread-robust than MIT. OpenLDAP page and a couple of
>> users have expirienced problems with MIT and threaded OpenLDAP
>> server, while Heimdal performed flawlessly.
>>
>> It could be that Heimdal IS thread-safe, just nobody knows for
>> sure. :-)
Ken> I believe that many of the problems of thread-safeness in MIT
Ken> Kerberos result from the lack of any file locking in the
Ken> replay cache code.
It would be nice if someone having crashes with OpenLDAP would get a
backtrace showing this. Certainly if the problem were well-defined
we'd be happy to spend a bit of time making Open LDAP users' lives
easier possibly on a relatively short time scale.
--Sam
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
