Hi Tomek, Thanks for your quick reply and clarification.
I was just worried that not the entire pool might be available for addresses allocation. I did a test with a pool of 2 addresses and both were successfully assigned so as you said, this is all expected behavior. /"When you think about it, your client sends a Request with IA_NA and no address. This means "give me an address". It could sent specific address, which would be interpreted as "can you give me this address?"./ That makes sense. To avoid two lookups in such scenario, why not sending the same advertised address (first address of each pool) to all clients ? This way you will end up with a single lookup for each Request regardless of the values of the IA_NA option and no need to reserve the advertise address for a short period of time. I might be completely off ;-) Thanks, Laurent. -- Sent from: http://kea-users.7364.n8.nabble.com/ _______________________________________________ ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. To unsubscribe visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users. Kea-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
