https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=258171
--- Comment #15 from Alexander <vo zaeb gmail com> 2011-07-09 14:10:08 --- Really? Where does it say that akonadi should annoy users? There is users problem if something won't work without required components, otherwise why needed the possibility to disable nepomuk if it's "so required"?. I use kmail and kaddressbook when nepomuk is disabled and no one died because of this. Anyway, KDE could notify users once, when they disable nepomuk, that some apps won't work without it, also it could notify users that something not working because of missed dependency, BUT ONLY in case when user tries to use this "something" and leave users in peace when they don't. But now I see that the boorish software behaves in a boorish way. I don't care about it any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
