https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226611
--- Comment #12 from Mikhail Teterin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Adriaan de Groot from comment #9) > I'd appreciate it if arguments over policies and procedures could happen > outside a particular bug. ... (As well as in reply to Mark Linimon from comment #10) > I have always tried to take this same approach with the PR database Then both of you should've spoken to mat@, when he posted his claims. Once he did, I had no other choice but to challenge them, for they are obviously bogus -- even if it was not polite of me to point that out. > tcberner@ in comment 3 has already said "open to patches", but it's fairly -- > really He did say that, but then a portmgr-member came out claiming this nonexistent policy. And, given that portmgr officially owns everything under Mk/, there is no point working up a patch while that body insists, things work as intended -- and thus, any patch will be rejected. It would be nice, if someone else from portmgr stated, that a proper patch will, indeed, be accepted once uploaded -- even if a proper repudiation of their colleague's bogus claims is too much to expect. > using "Not enough information" The amount of information supplied is perfectly sufficient -- everybody understands, what the problem is and how to reproduce it. > because there doesn't seem to be a patch Respectfully, that's not a good reason to close a PR... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
