Hi This is for the official ports tree. For us, it's fine :)
mfg Tobias On 26 June 2017 at 07:00, Schaich Alonso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:13:34 +0200 > Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thursday 22 June 2017 21:47:01 Schaich Alonso wrote: >> > and updated digikam, though the guidelines posted on our github project >> > page ask me not to make a pull request and commit to SVN instead, which >> > has been down for months now. Is the guideline outdated, or do we have >> > a new SVN repository? >> >> I .. don't see that anywhere? Where are you looking? >> >> If anything, "SVN" here means the official ports tree, for FreeBSD. The >> Area51 >> SVN ports tree, with merge-scripts and the whole shebang, is no more >> (although >> the machine has come back up, we've basically nuked the repo). >> >> So go ahead, do a pull request, that's the easiest way to work together on >> this ports tree (short of just committing to freebsd-ports-kde directly). >> Swills does it all the time. >> >> [ade] > > Hi > > This is the page that states SVN was prefered: > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-kde/blob/plasma5/CONTRIBUTING.md > > Alonso
