On Mittwoch, 19. Juni 2019 19:57:56 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 18 de juny de 2019, a les 12:04:38 CEST, David Edmundson va escriure: > > > Are we sure it's fair to assume people have SSD? our of the 4 laptops i > > > own, only 2 have SSD.> > > It's at least safe to assume it's the trend moving forward. > > > > > Do you think it's worth me trying in one of the two that don't have SSD? > > > > More data is normally a good thing. If you or anyone else wants to > > collect stats: > > From my git link above, it's as simple as running the normal ; cmake; > > make ; ./kinittest -median 5 > > On my very old/very slow computer seems to make a lot of difference > > RESULT : DaveTest::testQProcess(): > 2,625 msecs per iteration (total: 2,625, iterations: 1) > RESULT : DaveTest::testKInit(): > 1,852 msecs per iteration (total: 1,852, iterations: 1) > > > RESULT : DaveTest::testQProcess(): > 2,390 msecs per iteration (total: 2,390, iterations: 1) > RESULT : DaveTest::testKInit(): > 1,846 msecs per iteration (total: 1,846, iterations: 1)
Hey Albert, these numbers are quite impressive but I can't quite explain those. Are you measuring maybe a full debug build without any compiler optimizations? Then the library sizes will be _much_ larger and thus trigger more page faults. If every one of those is extremely slow on that machine compared to more modern machines? May I ask how old this machine is and what the speed of the HDD is? Thanks -- Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de http://milianw.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
