On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Vishesh Handa <m...@vhanda.in> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Harald Sitter <sit...@kde.org> wrote: >> >> > So yes, a better way of moving thing arounds is needed, or maybe we just >> > need >> > the dust to settle a bit so that we realize where each thing really >> > belongs >> > and it'll hopefully fix itself? >> >> Waiting for the dust to settle is what I have been told for almost a >> year now. > > > Frameworks hasn't even been out for a year. 6 months isn't a lot of time.
Of course we've been integrating it for longer than that and the difference between then and now is that back then things would move inter-framework on a 2-3 weeks schedule, and now they do move across entire release bundles on a bimestrial basis. There are almost 7 months worth of releases, but I am looking back at what appears like a year of integrating things that are moving about. Of course my memory might be giving in, who knows. >> >> How much more dust can there possibly be? :P >> The problem IMO is that supposedly the existing things will settle at >> some point, that doesn't mean a new thing couldn't end up in some >> plasma repo for 5.7 and then be moved into a framework 5.130 because >> it suddenly fits better into frameworks. > > > Are you trying to say that if something is once released part of Plasma it > should never be part of KDE Frameworks? No. I am saying that a new thing could appears in Plasma 5.7, gets moved to Frameworks 5.130 2 years later and this move then had nothing to do with settling dust. > Also, this is going to happen again with KF 5.9. Surely in a completely backwards compatible manner one hopes. :P HS _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
