El Dilluns, 7 d'abril de 2014, a les 22:24:44, šumski va escriure: > On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > > frameworks licenses. > > ... > > Last items =) > KRunner and KActivities are missing COPYING(.LIB), but the 'biggest' > remaining issue is kde4support, quote: > > "The spec file states only that the package is LGPL-2.1+ licensed. Indeed, > the predominant license in the source code files does appear to be > LGPL-2.1. However, there are instances of other licenses. If this cpp code > is compiled with the rest of the LGPL-2.1+ licensed kde4support code, it > could be said that the resulting work must be licensed under the GPL-2.0 - > this would have a material effect on the overall license of kdesupport4." > > Should kde4support be declared as GPL-2.0?
That's a bit weird, kdelibs has always (afaicr) been LGPL-compatible (i.e. LPGL or BSD/MIT, etc). so why would we have to declare kde4support (a subset of kdelibs) GPL-2? Cheers, Albert > > TIA, and cheers, > Hrvoje _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
