Am Montag, 12. Juli 2021, 20:22:30 CEST schrieb Frederik Schwarzer: > On 7/12/21 7:38 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Now what is meant by "clickable links to replacements" exactly? Any > > example > > for what you have in mind? > > (Just in case, Doxygen usually itself already generated automatic links to > > the functions (just needs complete signature, incl. const), see also > > https://www.doxygen.nl/manual/autolink.html > > but then I would guess you know that) > > Yes, that's what I meant. api.k.o does have clickable links (if done > properly) but compiler warnings do not. That's why it would be good to > keep the KF5 api docs.
Ah, so html pages on a server/local docs in QCH vs. compiler log, I see :) ((Old man blabla: decades ago one would have hoped we have more machine- processable output from compilers in 2021, e.g. rich text. But then we also still do patches as plain text diffs, not AST diffs... oh well :) )) > Any insight on how you kept the KDE 2-4 apidocs alive? Mainly defending against admin wanting to clean up dead stuff and just wiping the current freak setup behind api.kde.org ;) (which is https:// invent.kde.org/websites/quality-kde-org) Right now the kdelibs 2-4 docs are no longer regenerated (at the time when I got involved only the 4 one still was, but now also no longer is, and just is static files on the web server. I did some URL updates e.g. for trolltech.com- >qt.io using mass regexp replacements on them). IIRC main file of the generation is https://invent.kde.org/websites/quality-kde-org/-/blob/master/apidox/src/ gendox.sh But I dropped out when there were people talking about their progress in writing a replacement and put my hopes & bet on them. But seems life got in then it seems... Cheers Friedrich
