CC'd people: please can you confirm that you would be happy to have the files listed below relicensed from GPL to LGPLv2+?
Thanks On 19/02/14 20:18, šumski wrote: > Hi all, > > i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE > release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned > frameworks licenses. > Details in the links bellow (basically, certain files are not licensed as per > contained license). > Should those files be re-licensed, or should those frameworks have dual > license? > > > Cheers, > Hrvoje > -------- > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/223061 KItemModels kcheckableproxymodel.(cpp|h) is Stephen Kelly (and, for safety, David Faure). modeltest.(cpp|h) were taken from Qt Concurrent, and subsequently modified by Stephen Kelly, and touched by David Faure and Aurélien Gâteau (but I don't think the latter two count as copyright holders, judging from the commit messages). David is on record as being happy with relicensing to LGPLv2+ (with or without the e.V. clause) - see relicensecheck.pl in kde:kde-dev-scripts. > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/223093 KJS propertydescriptor.(cpp|h) is Bernd Buschinski. Possibly also David Faure (although, as already noted, David's code is not an issue). git log runs out early, though, so more investigation might be needed. > [1] https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/223081 Solid predicate_parser.(c|h) are false positives (Bison-generated; the skeleton has a license exception). other files: Ivan Čukić. Touched by me (not enough for me to hold any copyright, though) and Volker Krause (arguably the same, but he's on record as being happy with LGPLv2+ anyway, although without the e.V. clause). Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
