On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 04 December 2013 19:02:01 Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Aurélien Gâteau <agat...@kde.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I worked on generating diagrams for KF5 frameworks. The current output > can > > > be > > > > > > browsed here: > > > http://agateau.com/tmp/kf5 > > > > > > Those diagrams are created from cmake graphviz output of individual > > > frameworks, which is then processed and aggregated with scripts > available > > > from > > > > > > http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fgateau%2Fkf5dot.git > > > > > > My initial goal was to create one big diagram, but it is currently way > too > > > messy, so I also generated one diagram per framework. For tier1 and > tier2 > > > frameworks I included the Qt libs, but removed them for tier3 and > tier4 to > > > reduce clutter. I think those individual diagrams would be a nice > addition > > > to > > > the Doxygen doc of each framework. > > > > > > I initially used tred from graphviz to reduce clutter, but moved away > from > > > it > > > because it was a bit too happy to remove dependencies: for example > after > > > running through tred, KCMUtils appeared to have only one dependency: > > > XmlGui. > > > > > > I am considering generating simpler diagrams by hiding the framework > > > targets. > > > Hopefully it will make the big diagram more readable. > > > > > > Aurélien > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > > > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > > > > Hi Aurélien! > > This is a very nice effort, I already gave it a try and ended up quite > > frustrated. Good work! > > > > Maybe it would be interesting if we could have also a module dependencies > > diagrams, without the specific libraries inside, that sound like an > > implementation detail in some cases. For example, looking at KBookmarks, > > having an arrow specifying that KService depends on KConfigCore is a bit > > too much? > > Yep, definitely. I'd love to have it at the framework resolution, not the > libraries resolution. Should help quite a bit to see the tiers. > > Regards. > -- > Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net > > KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > > Well, I'm not so sure about being at a module level would help. We want to know if we depend on KIOCore or KIOWidgets, I guess.
Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
