El Dimecres, 31 de juliol de 2013, a les 10:44:41, Chusslove Illich va escriure: > > [: Albert Astals Cid :] > > After reading qt5 code it seems you can use XDG_DATA_DIRS to inject > > directories in GenericDataLocation, well, it's not that bad i guess > > I've just used this fact in a unit test initialization (via qputenv), to > point to the location of test-specific catalogs. So it works as such. > > But now I wonder how should the proposed directory binding method combine > with this. Should it have *lower* priority than XDG_DATA_DIRS? It seems to > me that otherwise the original feature would be lost, the user would not be > able to override the location any more. > > On the other hand, maybe the directory binding method should not be added at > all. For example, I've located the piece of code that Sebastian referred > to, and that should be ported by simply deleting all insertCatalog calls. > (In general, by removing all traces of translation handling for > out-of-library code: applets, dataengines, etc.)
IMHO removing the feature if it's not needed it's OK. Cheers, Albert _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
