Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday 18 July 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > find_package(Qt5 COMPONENTS Core Widgets) ? >> >> Is your question "I expect this to break but it doesn't. Why?"? > > No. Should I expect it to break ?
No. > On one side, it's a style question. Ok. That was not clear. > Multiple Qt modules can be searched > this way with one call. > Additionally, shouldn't libraries which are used directly also be linked > directly ? People using the gold linker had more problems with such things > than when using the GNU linker. I don't know in detail how this is handled > now with all the new features of imported targets in cmake. This has worked with cmake for a long time. Only LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES with imported targets were needed to make that work. > Are there downsides when using the umbrella Qt5 config file compared to > using the separate ones ? There is no point in specifying Core as you did above. These are equivalent: find_package(Qt5Widgets REQUIRED) find_package(Qt5 REQUIRED Widgets) Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
