On 2012-02-24, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote: > * the version numbers of the projects themselves > * the required Qt version This might differ across frameworks. I see no reason to artificial bump required version.
> * the required CMake version similar. > * the required extra-cmake-modules version similar. >> repositories to another solution having another script keeping another >> line in sync across repositories. >> >> Either the "set(CURRENT_LIBRARY_VERSION 5.3.10)" >> or the >> find_package(KF5BuildSpecs 5.2.3). >> >> And by chosing the latter we require everyone to do complete lock-step >> upgrades. > > What is a lock-step upgrade ? A requirement to upgrade other packages to upgrade a different package. Like FrameworkA and FrameworkB. One is related to fetching imap mails, the other is related to paint svg images on screen. I could imagine to want to be able to upgrade one without the other. Given we promise source and binary compatibilities, it should be perfectly possible. Except if we introduce artificial limitations like this one. /Sune _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel