On Friday 17 February 2012 20:37:12 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-02-17, Alexander Neundorf <neund...@kde.org> wrote: > > Do we still want a such a common version number ? > > If yes, who (which file/package) should define it ? > > No. It basically doesn't make sense. Also not in its current usage. > > if I e.g. take a kdepimlibs 4.3 and build against kdelibs 4.8, all my > pimlibs libraries are versioned like they were pimlibs4.8.
That behavior is indeed a problem. Still we need a way to ensure that we have the same version number accross all frameworks when we release. And to avoid the current problem it sounds likely to me that it would be a file generated when we create the release tarballs. CMake could then pick it up when executed, if said file is not present (e.g. developer build) then CMake should probably use the git revision instead. How does that sound? Sensible or smoking crack? Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
