Hi all, umbrello supports code import for several compiler languages. To increase the code quality we are adding test code fragments to git source to motivate developers to use them for unit tests. The fragments looks like
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=umbrello.git&a=blob&h=ee1411a1bfaa0c0376b4fff28d45b9867cf2c053&hb=13a513d629e86e8cc98d750f1d9e5741bbc8791a&f=test%2Fimport%2Fcxx%2Fcxx11-alternative-function-syntax.h // https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B11#Alternative_function_syntax // #1 template<class Lhs, class Rhs> auto adding_func(const Lhs &lhs, const Rhs &rhs) -> decltype(lhs+rhs) {return lhs + rhs;} // #2 struct SomeStruct { auto func_name(int x, int y) -> int; }; auto SomeStruct::func_name(int x, int y) -> int { return x + y; } In the given example https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#7._Licensing_of_Content states: "...When you re-use or re-distribute a text page developed by the Wikimedia community, you agree to attribute the authors in any of the following fashions: Through hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the page or pages that you are re-using (since each page has a history page that lists all authors and editors);" Because the fragment contains a link to the related source it looks okay from my non-layers perspective. On adding such test code I got an email about unknown license at https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/umbrello-devel/2016-September/020362.html. From the related page https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy I got the impression that this rule applies to real code compiled into a library or application. Is refering to the original source also okay in relation to this KDE license policy ? Regards Ralf
