On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:39:47 AM Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I'm not trying to bash anyone, I'm just really wondering about that. Is > > rekonq good enough for most KDE users (I find that hard to believe)? > > Why do you think it's hard to believe? > > I use rekonq for almost everything and for my full daily browsing. I use > Chromium for when I need to be logged into my Google account -- not because > of any type of support, but simply so I browse the internet *without* > being logged in.
rekonq doesn't working on my banking sites - I have to use chrome or Firefox. But ikhtml is even worse in that regard. No extensions/plugins - there's a number of extensions in firefox I just don't wwant to do without. However Aandrea is porting rekonq to K5 and there is a proposal for an extension api. For me extensions are close to being a must have feature for browsers. The abiulity to write them and a broad range of them. -- Lindsay
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
