On Sunday 10 February 2013 19:28:19 Alexander Rössler wrote: > I'm interested in adding my application to the KDE project and to mentor > some students during GSoC. The application is PhyxCalc (http://qt- > apps.org/content/show.php/PhyxCalc?content=149140 > ). I think I have already mentioned it last year. I'm only maintaining it > currently, but I think this application has potential and could also be > interesting for the KDE project (as KAC (KDE Advanced Calculator), just > kidding). Especially interesting is that it is purely based on Qt and C++, > which makes it quite outstanding I think for an calculator with parsing > functionality. Very special about it is actually the parser whose grammer is > saved in a text file instead of hard coding, making it very flexible. I > have already written on the GSoC page and a few students have already > contacted me that they would be interested.
Hey Alexander, could you give some insights into the differences to our existing KDE Edu projects like KAlgebra [1] and Cantor [2] (including Cantor's backends)? I would like to understand where the differences between them and PhyxCalc are, especially * where PhyxCalc goes beyond their features and * where the benefit of a stand-alone extension lies compared to extending our existing applications. IMO it would help much to understand your application better by understanding the differences to the applications we already ship. Maybe there is even a possible collaboration hidden that could be started :) Greetings, Andreas [1] http://edu.kde.org/applications/all/kalgebra [2] http://edu.kde.org/applications/all/cantor
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
