On Thursday, 2010-11-04, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Thursday, November 04, 2010 16:04:33 John Layt wrote: > > Which kind-of makes the whole GConf usage moot? > > No, it doesn't. If that stuff is still needed for actually using it, we're > still effectively depending on whateverlibgconfisin, and that, as Aaron > points out would be rather unfortunate.
We don't get any additional dependency, nor do we have to track them. It is a system service like NetworkManager, Samba, CUPS, etc. If people don't want it, they don't install it. If they want to use a different implementation due to personal politcal agenda against the other implementation's choice of technology, they are free to do so. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
