On 09-09-2019 10:24, Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 3:59 PM Arjen Hiemstra <ahiems...@heimr.nl>
wrote:
On 06-09-2019 02:49, Aleix Pol wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 PM Arjen Hiemstra
<ahiems...@heimr.nl>
wrote:
On 02-09-2019 19:26, Luigi Toscano wrote:
Arjen Hiemstra ha scritto:
[...]
That's actually a good point, though the kf5 is only in the
repository
name, I
name it "Quick Charts" everywhere else. Which is probably a good
reason
to have
the repo name changed in the first place. :) Originally, I put
kf5 in
the repo
name because that's what is used once installed as part of
Frameworks,
but I
agree that it can lead to confusing things.
It should be called kquickchart (which indeed is far too similar
to
kqtquickcharts). Much like you use KF5CoreAddons, but the
repository
is called kcoreaddons.
To be fair, KCoreAddons is called KCoreAddons in its documentation,
so
it
does not seem to be called "CoreAddons". At the same time, there are
plenty
of Frameworks that do not start with a K, like Solid, Prison or
BluezQt.
So I do not really see why it should be "kquickcharts".
Just my 2 cents:
The reason is consistency. Don't underestimate consistency. We have
done naming mistakes from time to time, but that should not imply
we should do it again.
+1 for KQuickCharts, names do matter.
At the same time, I could argue that we are trying to move away from k-
names in applications and might want to do the same for other parts of
KDE. But let's not argue semantics, if people insist on kquickcharts I
will change it to kquickcharts.
Best regards
Dominik
