El dilluns, 1 de juliol de 2019, a les 9:42:34 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: > On maandag 1 juli 2019 09:10:59 CEST Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > > > > This tells me that Gitlab can be worse, which is not surprising. > > > > And can it be better? Will some folks who have a good experience with this > > on Gitlab speak up? > > > > This is something that all of us want and need to know. > > > > Krita has switched from Phabricator to Gitlab a while ago, so maybe I can add > our experience. It's not that great, though. > > Bad: > > * For new users who want to submit one or two patches, gitlab is way harder > to use. They need much more help and handholding.
Really? It uses the workflow all the other major review systems use, arc is a really weird tool (on some distros even hard to install) Or were you mostly getting patches sent as plain diffs uploaded to phabricator instead of by using arc? > * Gitlab has an exceedingly confusing UI where many options are very hard to > find. The first thing I want to see when I get a MR is the diff, I guess that's your opinion, having the actual textual description and discussion is also very valuable, since you can get an overview on the MR quite fast. > and that means scrolling and hunting for a very small button. You mean the "Changes" button? I find it of adequate size > * gitlab is slow That's not the perception i have at all. > * you cannot have more than one reviewer for a MR You can have as many reviewers as you want, i guess you mean you can't have more than one assignee. > * using the label system for approving a MR is cumbersome What does this mean? Cheers, Albert
