this should help https://community.kde.org/ReleasingSoftware
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 9:25 AM Michael Reeves <reeves...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's what I'm looking at doing. The translation need some minor updating. 
> In particular the docs were changed to correct some obsolete information 
> regarding windows and preprocessor command handling.
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, 5:26 AM Luigi Toscano <luigi.tosc...@tiscali.it> wrote:
>>
>> Michael Reeves ha scritto:
>> >     What would be next step in getting a release setup fir kdiff3? Do we 
>> > have
>> >     documentation on the process?
>> >
>>
>> Right now kdiff3 is logically placed in a group called historically
>> "playground". The idea is: kick start the program, start few *unstable*
>> releases, ask for a community review (see "kdereview") and then allow the
>> program to have stable releases, either with its own cycle or as part of
>> another "product".
>>
>> The workflow is described here:
>> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle
>>
>> kdiff3 is a bit weird as it could have used the Incubator process and go
>> directly to kdereview, but that's not too relevant now.
>>
>> You may want to release a first unstable release, then ask for a community
>> review, or ask for a review first and then be moved to the relevant place and
>> have stable releases.
>>
>> Ciao
>> --
>> Luigi

Reply via email to