On 2017 M11 6, Mon 19:13:36 CET Martin Koller wrote: > On Montag, 6. November 2017 10:03:05 CET Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koller <kol...@aon.at> wrote: > > > On Montag, 6. November 2017 01:57:32 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Martin Koller <kol...@aon.at> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to announce an application I've implemented over the last > > > > > few > > > > > > weeks - liquidshell > > > > > > > > liquidshell is a replacement for plasmashell > > > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > I'm a bit confused, who is liquidshell for? > > > > > > Whoever does not like plasmashell, for whatever reason. > > > My reasons are mentioned in the README or the announcement mail. > > > Free software is about choice, no ? > > > > It is, of course. Then, it's also about non-fragmentation, and you know, > > human resources are spare. > > I know it's your time and your project and I will never tell you what to > > do, > > but considering that there's lxqt which exists basically for the same > > 'whatever reasons', why not help them instead of creating yet another > > desktop shell? > > lxqt say on their web page "The Lightweight Qt Desktop Environment" > > I don't want to create yet another Desktop Environment. > I was just unhappy with plasmashell, which liquidshell replaces
I tried lxqt too once, and while nice, I found quite some things lacking, IIRC if because it replaces really a lot of things and not only plasmashell. So while joining forces with lxqt sounds very obvious, lxqt AFAIK has a much wider focus, so I can understand starting a project which is "just" a replacement for plasmashell. Alex
