Luigi Toscano wrote: > Luigi Toscano ha scritto: >> Christoph Feck ha scritto: >>> On 11.11.2016 20:41, Thomas Eschenbacher wrote: >>>> as suggested by Ben, I hereby to inform you that today >>>> Kwave has been moved to kdemultimedia :) >>> >>> Thanks for your patience :) Did sysadmins also add an entry at reviewboard >>> or >>> phabricator for code reviews? If not, which would >>> you prefer? >> >> I would say that it's pointless for new projects to create reviewboard >> entries >> at this point. It would be good to start fresh directly with Phabricator. I >> can create the project and the observer repository. >> > > That said, the kwave repository is available already on reviewboard (it has > been for a while). The offer for Phabricator items still stands.
Well... that's a good question! I tried to find out what is the "must have" feature that would make me say "yes", but I am not sure. I think I already have all things that I need (and even more, the KDE infrastructure is really great!!!), and offering two different tools for bugtracking, reviewing, contributing and so on - wouldn't that confuse the users and bear the risk of having duplicates in the databases? Or are the databases behind coupled in some way? I am a friend of the philosophy "one project - one tooling", so I guess when I say yes to Phabricator it would be wise to switch off the already existing alternatives? regards, Thomas
