On Tuesday 22 December 2015 19:50:43 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Tuesday 22 December 2015, Thomas Lübking wrote: > > On Dienstag, 22. Dezember 2015 19:05:23 CEST, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > So, using Kross would mean implementing the kjs backend for it that we > > > had in 4.x times? > > > > Isn't the designated successor for QtScript QJSEngine (I even assumed > > there > > should be some porting tools?) > > > > About QtWebkit - what exactly does "disappear" mean in this context? > > Will it be impossible to link QtWebKit 5.5 to Qt 5.6 ? > > For if it would, that would be one giant ABI break and the answer would be > > to fork Qt... :-P > > No, probably not, it uses private Qt modules, so it cases the version > mismatch assert. But currently it looks like there will be a source-only > qtwebkit 5.6, but not as part of the official release.
And should be compilable for some time, indeed. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
