On 6 November 2013 20:51, T.C. Hollingsworth <tchollingswo...@gmail.com> wrote: > For instance, in Fedora we're probably going to be stuck with having > AppData included as SourceN files in SRPMs for quite some time.
No, if this is the case then I've failed. I want the AppData files to live upstream, controlled and modified by the maintainers, and translated by the upstream translators. I'm only accepting files into fedora-appstream that have been sent upstream while we're waiting for a new upstream release. For instance: https://github.com/hughsie/fedora-appstream/commit/27d56216e1c3e0f0613734e80735583ccbd2b774 > dump it in Fedora's transifex instance, and get them > back out and working in GNOME Software and Apper with minimal > difficulty. No, this isn't a Fedora "problem", this is an upstream feature. If we hide all the translations in Fedora then we're no better than canonical with the Ubuntu Software Center application data. > Also, I suspect that you don't want GNOME Software in other languages > to be a hairball of that language and English forever, so you're > probably going to want to turn off display of apps that aren't > translated at some point. That wasn't in my plans, no. Richard.
