2013/11/3 Richard Hughes <hughsi...@gmail.com>: > On 3 November 2013 17:15, Thomas Lübking <thomas.luebk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> * does it presently qualify as "standard" at all? (not as long as it states >> particular tools - like gnome i18n, as claimed by David) > > Well, it's my standard, and I'm happy to do the extra work if any > other desktop requires it. If you send me a website patch with an > example on how to localize the XML file on KDE, I'd merge it.
The point isn't that it explains gnome only and it should also explain KDE i18n. The point is that such information doesn't belong to the standard. The standard shouldn't tell you how to use the tools to generate the file. David Edmundson explained this issue better than me already. -- Nicolás
