On Tuesday, 7 de June de 2011 10:14:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 08:21:02 AM Sebastian Trüg wrote: > > Just as a side-note on SDO: For me SDO is very close to the KDE > > development process. If I had my way everyone running KDE master would > > also use SDO master. But for some reason that would only be acceptable > > if SDO were in KDE's git... > > It could be integrated into a "virtual" kdesupport, independent from where > it is hosted. > doesn't kdesrc-build actually do this ?
The part "shared-desktop" of the name seems to imply that it's not that close
to the KDE development process. If they are so close to the KDE development
process, why aren't they called "kde ontologies" instead?
Otherwise, it looks like people from the other camp who name their
technologies under generic names like Notifications or libwebkit and pretend
that they are the official solution for everyone.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
