John Layt <johnl...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 6 June 2011 23:36, Scott Kitterman <k...@kitterman.com> wrote: >> >> I get we need to modularize for a number of important reasons, but I >don't >> see >> the companion story for how this all gets released as something >coherent >> and >> functional. >> >> Where's that part of the story? >> >> Scott K >> > >From Sebas' email: > >What does it mean for packagers? > >* We make it possible to ship our frameworks in a more modular way >* We also plan to provide "monolithic tarballs" much as we do now, >depending > on the needs and preferences of downstreams >An email will follow from the people who participated in the Build and >Release work group on how they plan to make this work, please wait for >them >to report back. Fair enough. It might be helpful if someone who knows what topics are yet to come would provide a list. I don't recall this build and release work group being mentioned (I may have missed it). It's much easier to step back and wait for something you know is coming. Scott K
